"lunarin79"
Rojakman - hmm,we'll discuss payment at a later stage. Haha
Watchlooker - having the min markers is still ok, reading time at a glance will be easier but is a gd suggestion bro :mrgreen:
"watchlooker"
One question, the merlion caseback are you sure it will not infringe copyright? I find it do not match with the scs watch as a whole.
got a PVD explorer, the PVD work on the watch case is good but can't say the same for bracelet. It scratches easily..."Badern"
Interesting discussion. Thanks to CEO for updating me on this.
Dial is fine with me. Thots - Logo in red/orange to match markers?
Hands - no changes
Case - consider pvd? The pics of the explorer in pvd looks good
caseback - how about the logo from Thundercats? hahaha (half serious actually)
second lion (right) looks more fierce."lunarin79"
lion caseback
still in exploring around for a suitable theme, how bout a lion fish if we are to relate to a diver's watch?
"Cosmograph"
CEO, may I suggest that no LE numbers be put on the watch simply cuz everyone will (ok not all but a good majority) want to book this and that and instead, go with just 1 of 50 on the back. 01/50 for all. or a simple 50/50 or LE 50. This will help the whole process too. That's what I see IWC doing and to me works better than having individual numbers as people buy the forum watch anyway. Just my take.
"Threeemperor"
Can the wording limited edition be replaced by SCS edition?
Le Jin common...
Can we have lume bezel marker?
For your consideration..
Thanks
"Threeemperor"
Can the wording limited edition be replaced by SCS edition?
Le Jin common...
Can we have lume bezel marker?
For your consideration..
Thanks
"roo7"
I think unnumbered LE is a good idea too. Fact is this watch won't be reproduced for sale anyway without referencing back to SCS.
The SCS Edition 50. Sounds good. It will be the best if we can hit 65 :)
50 just inline with SG50 for 2015 thou.
i second that. :) it'll look cleaner."Cosmograph"
CEO, may I suggest that no LE numbers be put on the watch simply cuz everyone will (ok not all but a good majority) want to book this and that and instead, go with just 1 of 50 on the back. 01/50 for all. or a simple 50/50 or LE 50. This will help the whole process too. That's what I see IWC doing and to me works better than having individual numbers as people buy the forum watch anyway. Just my take.
"zeikphur"
[quote="roo7"]I think unnumbered LE is a good idea too. Fact is this watch won't be reproduced for sale anyway without referencing back to SCS.
The SCS Edition 50. Sounds good. It will be the best if we can hit 65 :)
50 just inline with SG50 for 2015 thou.
"Wade"
Any target price for this 2015 project watch?
"lunarin79"
[quote="Wade"]Any target price for this 2015 project watch?
"watchlooker"
I prefer no number totally at all. Too many LE from Seiko already.
"seiko siao"
[quote="watchlooker"]I prefer no number totally at all. Too many LE from Seiko already.
"Cosmograph"
CEO, would putting
200M
656 feet
be an alternative or vice versa? Instead of automatic? Thicker markers are a good idea.
"watchlooker"
How about do away with the automatic, 200m and the date window at 6 o'clock? Will look cleaner this way.
"lunarin79"
[quote="watchlooker"]How about do away with the automatic, 200m and the date window at 6 o'clock? Will look cleaner this way.
"lunarin79"
[quote="Cosmograph"]CEO, would putting
200M
656 feet
be an alternative or vice versa? Instead of automatic? Thicker markers are a good idea.
"Astro2212"
Zeikphur say simi i simi...hahaha...
Ceo taste also ok lah but he over nafa liao...i follow no up...
"Astro2212"
Zeikphur say simi i simi...hahaha...
Ceo taste also ok lah but he over nafa liao...i follow no up...