Re: Chiong Ahh!!!! Valjoux 7750 auto chrono falls below SGD$
Agree that movement forms a part of the value of the watch. Especially for rarefied movements. And yes, if I have to pick one I'm likely to go for the UHR.
Some additional thoughts.... I observed that for discontinued movements such as the seiko 6138, a great variation in resale exists. A 6138 flightmaster, a bullhead, a panda, among others, are valued by the market differently. The distinguishing factor is no longer the movement, but the sum-of-parts of the watch, including design of course.
On ETAs (including Valjoux family movements), a similar spread of resale occurs. An UHR for all intent and purposes uses the same movement as this:
But obviously the resale values are different. In the absence of established brand value, the movement plays an increased role in underpinning the resale value of a watch. But if brand value (which includes heritage as well) is significant, I sense that movement plays a less important role, and sum-of-parts value takes over.
The UHR does look like a good buy though, but the litmus test is to hold and feel the watch. Dropping a swiss movement in does not necessarily a good watch make. End of the day a valjoux is a mass market movement, and will command mass market resale value. So many watches use valjoux, and they must be distinguished by something other than movement alone where resale is concerned.