Seiko Club Singapore Museum

Is this misleading?

lunarin79
Is this misleading?
The seller said 'couple of small scratches on bezel' :roll: :roll:



i agree, pics does sometimes looks deceiving but although I'm not really an anal person on 'small scratches' but I think the description is not really correct. Bezel looked banged up & is that a scratch on the crystal??



tio bo?



http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs-orange-seiko-sumo-%A3200-ono-602078.html" false;
Ed.YEO
Re: Is this misleading?
Just my personal opinion.



The bezel's gloss is still there.

The scratches are visible, but i wouldn't consider that as bashed/f**ked up. Assuming that the watch owner had wear that for less than 5yrs.

The lume dot on the bezel is still intact.



If the price is right for you, hoot it. If you calculate the cost of post "restoration" too costly for you, or too eye distracting to you... forget about it.



If you look at my SANDOZ, i don't think my piece can even fetch $100.

lunarin79
Re: Is this misleading?

"Ed.YEO"




If you look at my SANDOZ, i don't think my piece can even fetch $100.



if based from pics, urs looks so much better than that :lol:
Ed.YEO
Re: Is this misleading?
brudder, you sure boh???

the bezel lost it's charm liao ley...

some more the lume on bezel also gone case liaoz...

in addition, lots of scratches on the bracelet... even tooth brush may not be able to clean the dirts hiding in the grooves ley...



but one thing about this piece i'm not giving up, 10yrs oredi, nvr suay-you(re-lubricate) still running good!

dropped few times liao, no needle come pops out, no bezel fall off, no crack crystal(sapphire ley, but no AR lah), no zhao-zhui(seconds mis-alignment), no time discrepancies... if i flip surte regret.
lunarin79
Re: Is this misleading?

"Ed.YEO"

brudder, you sure boh???

the bezel lost it's charm liao ley...

some more the lume on bezel also gone case liaoz...

in addition, lots of scratches on the bracelet... even tooth brush may not be able to clean the dirts hiding in the grooves ley...



but one thing about this piece i'm not giving up, 10yrs oredi, nvr suay-you(re-lubricate) still running good!

dropped few times liao, no needle come pops out, no bezel fall off, no crack crystal(sapphire ley, but no AR lah), no zhao-zhui(seconds mis-alignment), no time discrepancies... if i flip surte regret.


yes, it's always the description which matters



if this seller had decribed his listing sincerely rather than a few lines of words, i might still consider getting it from him :lol:
Ed.YEO
Re: Is this misleading?
if someone tries to sell his watch like me... talk like Ah-Long, some more long winded... you'll still kaukwan(buy it)?

next time i have to think of better british-accent-high-profile lines liaoz... maybe can try singlish too...
sinner1974
Re: Is this misleading?

"lunarin79"

The seller said 'couple of small scratches on bezel' :roll: :roll:



i agree, pics does sometimes looks deceiving but although I'm not really an anal person on 'small scratches' but I think the description is not really correct. Bezel looked banged up & is that a scratch on the crystal??



tio bo?



http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs-orange-seiko-sumo-%A3200-ono-602078.html" false;


cfm misleading... scratch on bezel and xtal like that he said good condition??? keke