:( warning

wtf bbq



http://cgi.ebay.com.sg/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180720543854&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649" false;







the crown is for ricoh not record... :roll: :roll: :roll:

lol no need warning bro, cos this kinda watch sooo common as you already knw.. a lot of grails for example also with rojak crowns,buyer got to take it as a challenge to find correct crown,the more popular = more info on correct crown.. else find correct crown for lesser known variant of the brand also big head riao..



yup indeed crown is for Ricoh and from what I see till nw,record crown normally is unsigned . the record movt 107 is a wartime movt,same one used in record ATP(same as mine)

record do have their own signed crown actually , but only introduced after they were taken over by longines ,also a R with a very distinctive design

"fireal"

but this signed crown by record exist from wat era? As I am more interested in pre war-40's record,anything with 15 or less jewels. Any age later than 50s I dun knw riao.. :lol:

60s to late 80s~





actually watches in general pre war v little signed crowns , omega naiad for one 1938

oh bro,not sure but anyway ...

reason for my first reply regarding 'unsigned crown' for record is because that particular model in the auctionsite link is a wartime model(record 107 with 15J),probably dragged to early 50s. So not sure if by that time record started to use signed crown already?

or should it be unsigned still?



*just saw your reply above.



So think the auctionlink record should have a plain unsigned crown.